is based on the curvature of the surface, and in particular on the
number of
critical points
for
height functions on the
surface. To find an analogous result for polyhedral surfaces we use
the following characterizations of polyhedral critical points:A vertex v of M is called a local extreme vertex if v is a vertex of the convex hull of the star of v, and it is a (global) extreme vertex if it is a vertex of the convex hull of M. Note that a local extreme vertex is the local maximum for the height function on M in some direction, and that a vertex that is not locally extreme is a saddle point for every height function on M.
With these definitions, we can describe tight polyhedral surfaces as follows:
Lemma: An immersed polyhedral surface M is tight if, and only if,
Note the relationship of this description to the division into the M+ and M- regions: property (1) says that there is no local maximum inside the convex hull (i.e., all the positive curvature is on the outside), property (2) says that most of the convex envelope is present (perhaps minus the interiors of some facets) forming the analog of the M+ region, and property (3) says this region is embedded.
All three conditions are required, as can be seen from some simple
examples
.
The basic idea behind the proof is to use the fact that tightness is
equivalent to the
two-piece property
to show that an interior local extreme vertex can be cut off along
with a global extreme vertex contradicting tightness, and if an edge of
the convex hull is missing from the surface, then its two vertices can
be cut off with one slice, again contradicting tightness.
This lemma provides a convenient method of checking a polyhedral surface for tightness; in fact, a computer can be programmed to perform this check, given the positions of the vertices and edges of the surface.
Proof of the Lemma
Tightness and homology: the modern definition
Kuiper's initial question
The polyhedral solution
Introduction
9/29/94 dpvc@geom.umn.edu --
The Geometry Center